Iowa Supreme Court Justice David May is facing a retention vote in the 2024 election after voting in favor of a law banning most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy. This decision has sparked debate among Iowans, with some opposing the new restrictions on abortion and urging voters not to retain May. The Iowa Poll found that 59% of Iowans disapprove of the abortion ban.
Experts have differing opinions on the role of retention votes, with some arguing that it allows voters to hold justices accountable for their decisions, while others believe it threatens judicial independence. Scott Peters, a political science professor, argues that judges’ decisions are inherently political and voters should weigh in on retention based on their dissatisfaction with a justice’s rulings. On the other hand, Guy Cook, a former president of the Iowa State Bar Association, believes justices should not be punished by voters for individual decisions.
The current situation echoes a past case in 2010 when three Iowa Supreme Court justices were voted off the bench after legalizing same-sex marriage in the state. If May is not retained, Governor Kim Reynolds will appoint another justice. The Iowa Supreme Court nomination process involves a 17-member panel nominating candidates, with Reynolds controlling a majority of the commission. Regardless of the outcome of the retention vote, the debate highlights the intersection of law, politics, and judicial independence in Iowa.
Source
Photo credit www.iowapublicradio.org