Former President Donald Trump, known as a “tariff man,” has touted tariffs as beneficial for the economy, leading Vice President Kamala Harris to criticize this economic approach. Surprisingly, a House Democrat, Rep. Jared Golden, has introduced a bill to codify Trump’s 10% across-the-board tariffs, revealing bipartisan divides on this issue. Tariffs, historically used as a source of government revenue, fell out of favor during the 20th century as the U.S. championed free trade policies. While free trade has lowered consumer costs, critics argue it has harmed American manufacturing and jobs.
Golden’s bill aims to promote domestic manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign goods, drawing from the concept that the country should avoid being overly dependent on imports. Harris has criticized Trump’s proposed tariffs as harmful to consumers, while some Republican critics, like Sen. Rand Paul, have introduced legislation to limit presidential authority in imposing tariffs.
Despite criticisms, the Biden-Harris administration has maintained some of Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods and even increased fees on certain sectors. While economists generally oppose tariffs due to their negative economic impact, they remain popular politically, with a majority of Americans supporting the idea of tariffs. Golden argues that tariffs could benefit American workers and national security, even if they result in higher prices for imported goods.
Overall, the ongoing debate over tariffs reveals deep divisions within both political parties on trade policy and highlights the complex economic considerations at play.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com
